The first IaaS in Russia: an exchange of views

http://habrahabr. ru/company/parking/blog/98469 /. ).

Speaking of Habrahabr. Of course, I know about this popular resource, but admit a little bit (and rarely get there ). As I just now realized there is also a section on ' company ', in fact - a local blog site of a company. I assume that the company is a service is not free.

And in fact, it is certainly not a blog, and such information and content feed company. Because the blog - it's personal record for a specific author. And then - anonymous publication of such press releases in a free format, with no signature.

That this publication. You go to a page. And who wrote it, who is the author of the text? . But we can guess that this is the text of Parking. ru.

Now, in fact. I recall the story of the issue. June 28 was a joint press conference MS Parkung. ru. On this occasion it was written a few posts I.

http://cloudclub-ru. blogspot. com/2010/06/blog-post_28. html.
http://cloudclub-ru. blogspot. com/2010/06/iaas. html. ( 28. 06. 2010 - detailed questions of the event ).
http://www. itblogs. ru/blogs/kolesov/archive/2010/07/05/62140. aspx. ( 05. 06. 2010 - another reminder ).
That article on the topic in PC Week (. http://www. pcweek. ru / themes / detail. php? ID = 124379. ).

I is the fact that the publication. http://habrahabr. ru/company/parking/blog/98469 /. dated.
07. 07. 2010.

Here's how it starts:.
============.
This past Monday, June 28 press conference Parking. ru and the Microsoft cloud service dedicated to the launch Slidebar. Behind the scenes there was a set of questions that were asked by reporters later in the lobby or were not given at all, in this post I want to give a more thorough and detailed response to them and to express the view of Parking. ru on the situation with the market ' cloud hosting ' in Russia.

The text is constructed as a question - answer....
=================.

What can I say....

a. Generally speaking, it is too late and a few odd. Questions were asked by journalists... So it would be nice and somehow address the answers to journalists. So that they can ask more questions. I'm not saying that in order, and held a press conference to answer reporters' questions, rather than later, 10 days later to answer a completely different audience.

2. I assume that my publications in the subject, including my post with a detailed analysis of events and questions about it (. http://cloudclub-ru. blogspot. com/2010/06/iaas. html. ) Anonymous author of Parking. py. were known. Moreover, the text as a whole is constructed as a series of issues identified was in my account.

Why the author did not result in references to ' the source of the issues '? .

3. Now, in fact answers. As I understand it, all the same to my questions.

Text Me Parking. py in general do not like. There is some useful information, but in general this is not the answers to questions. More like a typical corporate response about life in general... When you ask: what can you say about the weather forecast for tomorrow (you'll need to go on a picnic and decide how to dress ), and in response to you talk about common problems of forecasting the weather, and how .

in short. I'm not sure on whose questions they answered Parking. py. But I have the answers to their questions had not received.

Well, I 'm not talking about the fact that all this should be done once operational, in the dialogue (if you were referring to journalists).
And then as the same weather: you're asking about the weather for tomorrow and get an answer within a week. But not yet on the question that was asked.